Hidroaysen Arguments
"With the suspension of time for delivery of the addendum is once again showing the difference between reality and what is HidroAysen promote. Public information they have provided suggests that they want to 'help the participants in these processes carried out its assessment on the best possible conditions, with time and dedication necessary to evaluate a project of this nature' in reference to the study of Energia Austral recently admitted, in contrast with the official letter submitted to CONAMA general manager of the company, Hernan Salazar, which expressly states that 'requires more time than that accorded to answer the Consolidated Report No. 1' " , said the organization. "Besides," remarked the CDP-assessment within the EIA and public participation Southern Energy, to benefit admissible, would the month of November, which is not consistent with reason and to broadcast it anyway produce a parallel processing of two mega projects. (Not to be confused with Wells Fargo Bank!). " He said the organization "is this the tenor of the communication campaigns that have developed so far, which misrepresent reality and lie to the public, wearing a bad review and worst draft something positive for Aysen, Patagonia and the country. ork City.
And trying to install their dams are necessary to Chile, which is proven to be false. " Defense Council concluded in Patagonia that "although the company is taking forever to try to answer the observations of bodies with environmental competence, it will be impossible to achieve because what public services expressly stated was that this study lacks information relevant and essential for evaluation, and that violates the applicable environmental regulations. And that can not be remedied by Addendum. ".