Archive for June, 2014

European Central Bank

Sunday, June 15th, 2014

Maximum representative of the banking system of the old continent was declared the President of the European Central Bank, criticized before the little regulation that they were suffering from the financial markets. Control and adjustment based on equilibrium and banking transparency the current financial products range from simple current accounts, deposits, mutual funds, shares, private to complex products structured warrants, derivatives, fixed income futures, cards, or hedge funds. The first group perhaps doesn’t require an exhaustive control because they govern the maxim of a consideration of money between applicant or plaintiff or speculation in the market value of a company, an organization or a State. The guarantees of a deposit or current account are obvious. Funds and actions are governed in the revaluation of a company that should be audited by a strict commercial regulations. Guarantees for investors in these cases were and are unquestionable. In the second group experience and the current financial situation we show yourself needing an extreme regulation and even the obligation to limit access to any investor.

Logic also obliged the profound reflection in products where we can sell something that we have not yet obtained, ensure a payment with the payment of a debtor for a mortgage of doubtful debts, ensuring a profitability and a warranty on function not guaranteed profits, only provided. No President of central bank, IMF, World Bank or maximum political representative has questioned this lucrative situation until it has hurt their economies and it has reached to cause a global recession. After Trichet other dignitaries will reflect and criticize the financial markets. Inconsistent most of these statements is responsibility that none of them assumes and calls into question. Now it seems that there will be greater regulation and control but the incompatibility with the traditional capitalist model seems to be difficult to overcome. The free market defended in the United States in front of the control of the Lord Another Trichet’s problems that will have to assume the supporters of greater control in the financial market is the confrontation with the even greater economy of the planet: the United States. The Bush Administration has already declared that it atentaria against the rules of the free market and effectively the recovery of its economy is based on giving freedom to investors, companies and financial markets to continue leading the economic control of the planet. The limitation and control would lead to an orderly and linear growth but the balance would cause a redistribution of wealth that would make them uncompetitive. We hope that the statements and wishes of Mr Trichet end up being a reality.

Kadafi Oil

Thursday, June 5th, 2014

The obvious one happened! The ONU (Reads ' ' The United States ' ') it decided to invade the Lybian to guarantee the Zone of Aerial Exclusion, that is, to prevent that the government of Muamar Kadafi uses aerial bombings against the rebels. Who gains a Juquinha bullet to distrust that the true intention of the invaders is not to defend the Lybian people, much less to direct the country in the route of the democracy. The patrimony of the Kadafi family is bigger of what the richness of the owner of Microsoft, Bill Gates. Investment fund its I possessed money spread in all the cantos of the world, also in Brazil and the Italian teams Juventus. The Lybian is the eighth producing greater of oil of the world (the oil production fell four times since the beginning of the conflicts. This and other factors had made the price of the oil to go off). Said this, my friends, I do not have doubts of that the concern of the ONU is with the consequncias of a civil war that threat if to prolongate. Little matters for the occidental powers if who governs the Arab countries they are democratical or dictators.

This is fallacy to vender periodical. The basic one is that these countries have steady governments. Only this! The ONU already was born deformed and continues until today. What it justifies not to have ' ' guaranteed the rights civis' ' in Ruanda and the Bsnia, a recent past? How not to intervine in the diverse Israeli and Palestinian situations where if they killed in the Middle East? (by the way, I must assume that the ONU ' ' determinou' ' that Israel only returned territories conquered in the War of the Six Days that Israel ' ' not quis' ') What to say of some African countries that notadamente are ditatoriais and disregard right human beings, as Ivory Coast and Sudan? The reply for all these questions are very simple: everything depends on the economic interests or politicians of the calls ' ' powers ocidentais' '. Finally, any possible picture in the Lybian. In case that the conflicts cease, it is well probable, as well as in the Iraq of the time of the Gulf, that the dictator continues in the power, since that oil is prontinho pra to be vendido for the world.